Which statement best describes the relationship between Guidance 213 and feed-use drugs?

Which statement best describes the relationship between Guidance 213 and feed-use drugs?

• A. Guidance 213 moves certain feed-use drugs to require VFD; OTC status ends for those drugs.
• B. Guidance 213 expands OTC access to all feed-use drugs.
• C. Guidance 213 bans all feed-use drugs entirely.
• D. Guidance 213 has no impact on feed-use drugs.

Answer: (A)

Guidance 213 targets antibiotics used in animal feed that are important for human medicine and shifts how they can be used. It encourages moving certain feed-use drugs from over-the-counter status to a system that requires veterinary oversight through a Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD). In practical terms, this means those drugs are no longer available OTC and must be used under a veterinarian’s authorization and according to the labeled directions. This is why the statement that best describes the relationship is that Guidance 213 moves certain feed-use drugs to require a VFD, ending OTC status for those drugs. It doesn’t expand OTC access, it doesn’t ban all feed-use drugs, and it does have an impact on how these products are used in practice.

Guidance 213 targets antibiotics used in animal feed that are important for human medicine and shifts how they can be used. It encourages moving certain feed-use drugs from over-the-counter status to a system that requires veterinary oversight through a Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD). In practical terms, this means those drugs are no longer available OTC and must be used under a veterinarian’s authorization and according to the labeled directions. This is why the statement that best describes the relationship is that Guidance 213 moves certain feed-use drugs to require a VFD, ending OTC status for those drugs. It doesn’t expand OTC access, it doesn’t ban all feed-use drugs, and it does have an impact on how these products are used in practice.